Aaron Bean commented on the following Blogs (Feb. Monthly Summaries):
Group 1, Group 4
Wilisha Scaife commented on the following Blogs (Feb. Monthly Summaries):
Group 3, Group 5, Group 6
James Brunson commented on the following Blogs (Feb. Monthly Summaries):
Group 1, Group 2, Group 3
PROGRAM INVESTIGATION OF NARRATIVE LEARNING IN PRACTICE
Program Investigation
of Narrative Learning in Practice
Aaron Bean, James Brunson and Wilisha
Scaife
Group 6
Ball State University EDAC 634
Program Investigation
of Narrative Learning in Practice
Introduction
Merriam,
Caffarella, and Baumgartner (2007) explain that “narrative learning is the use
of stories in the construction of meaning, whether the meaning making has to do
with the self, with the content of instruction, or with the world around us” (p.216).
At its core, a narrative perspective holds that human beings
have a universal predisposition to 'story' their experience, that is, to impose
a narrative interpretation on information and experience. At a very basic
level, 'Stories consist . . . of events, characters, and settings arranged in a
temporal sequence implying both causality and significance' (Carter 1993: 6).
As a review, main themes of narrative learning
are associated with the form of narrative being considered. “Rossiter (2005)
and Rossiter and Clark (in press) identify three ways in which stories appear
in practice: “storying” the curriculum, storytelling, and autobiography.” (Merriam, Caffarella, & Baumgartner, 2007, p. 209)
·
‘Storying’ the Curriculum – the
curriculum or the text of a course is treated as a story and students interact
with these texts to come to some understanding or interpretation of the subject
matter. For example, in a graduate research seminar on the development of the
knowledge base of adult education, Merriam made use of research journals dating
back to the 1930s, periodic reviews of research, and historical literature on
the founding of professional associations and graduate programs in adult
education. These materials were read and examined with the goal of telling a
story (not necessarily the story) about how the knowledge base of adult
education has come to be constructed as it has. Each student was asked to
interpret these materials and to write a paper (a story) about the development
of the knowledge base.
·
Storytelling – comes in various
forms such as fiction, case studies, role-playing, or critical incidents. These
are common means of engaging students in understanding concepts, principles, or
theories through this narrative form. Using stories to engage students in ideas
that are part of course content may be the only way to allow understanding to
occur. It is also a powerful means of making connections not only with ideas
but with other learners, perhaps ultimately creating a learning community.
Whether these stories are generated by students themselves, are case studies,
or are fictional accounts, they draw us in, they allow us to see from another’
s perspective.
·
Autobiographies – are by the self
and about the self and can include journaling, dream logs, therapy, blogs, and
educational biographies.
This use of narrative to make sense
of the world appears to begin quite early in life: even very young children
comprehend and create stories long before they can grasp abstract and detached
facts, propositions, or laws (Lyle 2000, Hoodless 2002). Story is a fundamental
way of human knowing. Because it is so foundational to ‘living life,’ it can be
a very effective tool in adult learning on many levels and in nearly all
settings. From influencing the adult learning environment by using its features
in a ‘getting to know you’ activity of introduction in a training course, to
shaping an entire curriculum for pre-service teachers who will learn to
maximize their affect though ‘storytelling;’ Narrative has the power to
significantly impact the learning and
the learner.
The
goal of this program investigation paper is to look closely at two programs
that are using narrative learning. The investigations of these very different environments
and how each is utilizing this theory, will inform our team as we move forward
in our narrative project design.
Program of Investigation #1
Narrative Learning Educational
Program Investigation for the Building
Construction Management Program at Ivy Tech Community College Northeast in Fort
Wayne Indiana
Program
Description
The
Building Construction Management (BCOM) Program, which is chaired by James
Brunson, prepares adult learners for entry level positions in estimating,
project management, business management, and other managerial positions in the
building construction industry. Learners can earn two different degrees. One of
these is an Associate of Science (A.S.), which is designed to readily transfer
to a four year building construction management program, such as those
available at Ball State University, Purdue University, and Indiana State
University. The other degree is an Associate of Applied Science (A.A.S.), which
is mainly designed to be a terminal degree. It should be noted, however, that
Bachelor of Applied Science (B.A.S.) programs being developed at Purdue University
and Indiana State University are expected to regard the A.A.S. degree highly
for transfer purposes toward satisfying requirements for these new B.A.S.
degrees. The Ivy Tech BCOM program description page can be viewed at the
following web address: http://www.ivytech.edu/building-construction-management/index.html Curricula for the current
academic year for the two Ivy Tech BCOM degrees can be found at the following
web pages: A.S. https://wwwapps.ivytech.edu/cgi-bin/curr/gpcurriculum_print.cgi?currlinkid=2714&campusid=4 ; A.A.S. https://wwwapps.ivytech.edu/cgi-bin/curr/gpcurriculum_print.cgi?currlinkid=2713&campusid=4
Main
Features
Main
features of the BCOM program must begin with its faculty. Faculty members are
chosen carefully to be sure credentialing requirements are fully met. Also,
faculty members must have considerable depth of building construction
experience upon which to draw as they teach BCOM courses. James Brunson,
program chair, is the only full time BCOM faculty member. Three adjunct faculty
members also teach in the program. Each of these instructors is fully
credentialed at the program level and highly experienced. Physical features are
important too. Certain BCOM courses utilize a modern well-equipped construction
lab. Several others make use of a modern computer lab. Current versions of
computer software appropriate for the program are utilized intensively. Field trips
to significant construction sites are incorporated into certain courses to
provide students exposure to real-world building construction environments,
along with opportunities to interact with building construction professionals.
Comparison of Theory and Practice
The
theory of narrative learning can be summarized as follows. Narrative learning
imparts learning through story-telling and conceptualization on the part of the
learner. Learners can be both tellers of narratives or listeners, as classmates
or instructors share narratives. For narratives to make sense they must have a
point. Narratives relate new information, help listeners make valuable mental
connections to prior experiences, or provide listeners the opportunity to have
valuable new vicarious experiences.
The
BCOM faculty was chosen carefully so they would have plenty of narratives to
share. Faculty members are encouraged to personalize narrative learning
experiences by interacting with learners while narratives are being shared. The
physical environment where BCOM classes are taught contributes significantly to
the effectiveness of narratives. Narratives can be illustrated or receive
emphasis when told in the construction lab, where learners are surrounded by
materials and tools or in the computer lab where building construction drawings
and specifications are always at hand and internet access for focused research
is immediately available.
Building
construction site field trips provide learners rich wells of resources for
fashioning narratives of their own, which they are encouraged (sometimes
required) to create by way of personal reflections. The advisory committee is
kept informed about the status of the BCOM program as the program chair shares
narratives formed from recent classroom and other experiences. Committee
members are encouraged to share narratives too, when these would help
illustrate points made about program suggestions and direction.
Program of Investigation #2
REAL* E-Portfolio Academy for K-12 Teachers
Dr. Helen
Barret, University of Alaska (Retired)
Program Description
Dr. Helen
Barret, retired University of Alaska professor, developed this online course
for the use of K-12 educators who are looking for help and guidance in the
implementation of electronic portfolios.
An E-Portfolio is a purposeful collection of work that demonstrates
effort, progress and achievement over time, stored in an electronic container:
it is also a means of being able to perform digital storytelling, or narrative
learning through the use of digital media. The portfolio can help by providing students
with a way to organize, archive and display pieces of their work. Dr. Barrett’s program focuses on using
digital media as a means to engage the student and assist with reflection,
which is a powerful tool for students and teachers alike. Here is a link to a
video where Dr. Barret describes digital storytelling in a more precise manner:
http://vimeo.com/23513397
The learners, in this program, are
any and all students whose teacher facilitates the operation of the
E-Portfolio. Teachers themselves may learn a lot through this process as well.
This program’s purpose is to develop an understanding that
the E-portfolio can serve many different aspects for teachers, such as:
learning, assessment, and employment. A formative learning portfolio can be
used as an ongoing basis to support professional development. A summative
assessment portfolio can aid in the process of formal evaluation. Finally, a
marketing employment portfolio can aide is seeking out work.
Teachers can use this program to
help students realize the differences in content and structure of academic
(learning) vs. marketing/showcase vs. assessment portfolio. This also would help garner a better breadth
of artifacts for the student. This E-portfolio program was created to be
exclusively used online, and to facilitate the use of various software programs
which aide in the development of the personal folder of works. Dr. Barrett
has offered a great starting point for educators to get the ball rolling and
move their students into the 21st century.
Main Features
The program is broken down into various
segments, (who, what, why and how), so that educators can seek out
clarification each step of the way. It has a syllabus, activities and
coursework. This ensures that educators learn the basics of E-portfolios and develop
a pathway for including this into their curriculum. Here is a screenshot of the main screen that
guides the learning process:
A major
feature that I chose to single out from the program is the aspect of “Digital
Storytelling.” Telling your story digitally is a means to express through the
use of digital media a personal anecdote, an autobiography. It gives students
the opportunity to develop communication skills by learning to ask questions,
express opinions, construct narratives and write for an audience
(Digitalstorytelling.coe.uh.edu 2013).
Comparison
of Theory and Practice
A major similarity between Dr.
Barrett’s program and the academic descriptions of narrative learning is the
idea that reflection is an integral component of learning. Pre-service teachers
can use storytelling to be reflective about their experiences in the classroom
(Binks, Smith, Joshi, 2009). Reflection is a major key for effective teaching
and was believed to be a critical component for teachers to employ. In the REAL
E-portfolio program the learner’s reflections are the rationale that specific
artifacts are evidence of achieving stated goals or objectives (Barrett, 2001).
By utilizing reflection practices students remain in charge of their learning.
In addition, there is a section of
Digital Storytelling in Dr. Barrett’s program that is dedicated to the Introduction of self, which is the
development of voice, personality, and identity. It is through this development
that students can recognize what experiences have molded their own personality.
These aspects are important features, which correlate with the Narrative
Learning Theory. The learner moves from
a cognitive understanding of the concept to link it to his/her own experiences
(Merriam, 2008) and the learner makes a connection.
Conclusion: Narrative Learning
Program Applications
Aspects
of Narrative learning are being utilized to good effect in the BCOM program
presently, but there is much room for improvement. BCOM faculty will be
encouraged to make sure the loop is fully closed and the point of the narrative
is well-made. Internalization of lessons conveyed through narratives can be
improved through more rigorous encouragement and requirement concerning
personal reflection on the part of learners. Also, creation of awareness within
learners about how they are “writing” their life narratives, even while
participating in the BCOM program, appears to hold much potential for helping
create and sustain motivation for personal excellence.
We
take a few lessons from BCOM by applying what they missed. We will ensure that
a project plan that fully envelopes adult learners/participants. We will embed a
more rigorous and intentional expectation of narrative in our plans. We will make
necessary the careful step of personal reflection and the practice of writing
life narratives.
E-portfolio
is a wonderful and relevant way to engage today’s adult learner while igniting
excitement and confidence for growing and
going forward. This use of computers and bringing stories to life is
paramount in helping bridge connections between students. This also builds real
world skills in the use of technology. Students can also regain confidence as
they learn to incorporate more tools in their educational arsenal.
Making the web-space our ‘learning
space’ is a consideration for our project structure. The following are a few
features from the REAL E-portfolio Program which could be
used in our program:
- Learning
Journals
- Reflective
Writing
- Biography
- Memoir
References
Barrett, H. (2001). Electronic portfolio.
Educational Technology, an Encyclopedia.
ABL-CIO.
(Dec.
2003)
Binks, E. S., Smith, D., Smith, L.,
& Joshi, R. M. (2009). Tell me your story: A reflection
strategy for pre-service teachers. Teacher
Education Quarterly, 36, 141-156.
Carter, K. (1993).
The place of story in research on teaching and teacher education.
Educational Researcher, 22 (1), 5--12, 18.
Merriam, S. (2008). Third update on adult learning theory: New directions for adult and
continuing
education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., &
Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
University of Houston. (2013) The educational uses of digital
storytelling. Digital Storytelling.
Retrieved from http://digitalstorytelling.coe.uh.edu/aboutthissite.html